Bolivia vs Kazakhstan: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Bolivia
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Bolivia rank
156th
Kazakhstan rank
153rd

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Bolivia
  • Kazakhstan
0000199220072023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Bolivia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.4 times Bolivia's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.

Bolivia ranks 156th and Kazakhstan ranks 153rd of 202 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Bolivia or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Bolivia as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Bolivia and Kazakhstan?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Kazakhstan?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bolivia and Kazakhstan rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Bolivia ranks 156th and Kazakhstan ranks 153rd of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Kazakhstan: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/kazakhstan/">Bolivia vs Kazakhstan: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.