Botswana vs Turkmenistan: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Botswana
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkmenistan
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
186th
Turkmenistan rank
185th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Turkmenistan
00000199220072023

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Turkmenistan ahead.

Botswana ranks 186th and Turkmenistan ranks 185th of 202 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre —
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Botswana or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Botswana and Turkmenistan?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Turkmenistan?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Turkmenistan rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 186th and Turkmenistan ranks 185th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Turkmenistan: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/botswana/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/botswana/turkmenistan/">Botswana vs Turkmenistan: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.