Bulgaria vs Guam: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Bulgaria
0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Guam
0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Bulgaria rank
36th
Guam rank
33rd

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Bulgaria
  • Guam
0000199020062023

How they compare

Guam currently reports 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Bulgaria, a difference of 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Guam's figure about 1.1 times Bulgaria's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bulgaria ahead.

Bulgaria ranks 36th and Guam ranks 33rd of 202 countries.

Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria Guam Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Bulgaria
2010s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Bulgaria
2020s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Bulgaria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Bulgaria or Guam?
Guam, at 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Bulgaria as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Bulgaria and Guam?
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Guam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Guam?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bulgaria and Guam rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Bulgaria ranks 36th and Guam ranks 33rd of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bulgaria vs Guam: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/bulgaria/guam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/bulgaria/guam/">Bulgaria vs Guam: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.