Cape Verde vs Cambodia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Cape Verde
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
106th
Cambodia rank
108th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Cambodia
00000200020112023

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Cambodia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 106th and Cambodia ranks 108th of 202 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 2 and Cambodia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Cambodia Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Cape Verde
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Cape Verde or Cambodia?
Cape Verde, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Cambodia as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Cape Verde and Cambodia?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Cambodia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and Cambodia rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Cape Verde ranks 106th and Cambodia ranks 108th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Cambodia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/cambodia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/cambodia/">Cape Verde vs Cambodia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.