Cambodia vs Eswatini: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Cambodia
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia rank
108th
Eswatini rank
105th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Cambodia
  • Eswatini
00000200020112023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Cambodia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eswatini ahead.

Cambodia ranks 108th and Eswatini ranks 105th of 202 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Eswatini Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Cambodia or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Cambodia as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Cambodia and Eswatini?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Eswatini?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Eswatini rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Cambodia ranks 108th and Eswatini ranks 105th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Eswatini: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/eswatini/">Cambodia vs Eswatini: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.