Cayman Islands vs Latvia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Cayman Islands
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Cayman Islands rank
78th
Latvia rank
79th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Cayman Islands
  • Latvia
00000199220072023

How they compare

Cayman Islands currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.

Cayman Islands ranks 78th and Latvia ranks 79th of 202 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cayman Islands averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cayman Islands Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Cayman Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Cayman Islands or Latvia?
Cayman Islands, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Cayman Islands and Latvia?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Cayman Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Latvia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Cayman Islands and Latvia rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Cayman Islands ranks 78th and Latvia ranks 79th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cayman Islands vs Latvia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/cayman-islands/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/cayman-islands/latvia/">Cayman Islands vs Latvia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.