Chile vs Latvia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Chile
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
81st
Latvia rank
79th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Latvia
0000199020062023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Chile ranks 81st and Latvia ranks 79th of 202 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Chile or Latvia?
Latvia, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Chile and Latvia?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Chile and Latvia rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 81st and Latvia ranks 79th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Latvia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/chile/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/chile/latvia/">Chile vs Latvia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.