China vs Hong Kong: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

China
0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong
0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
27th
Hong Kong rank
28th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Hong Kong
00000197119972023

How they compare

China currently reports 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

Across all 34 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 27th and Hong Kong ranks 28th of 202 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre China
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre China
2010s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre China
2020s 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, China or Hong Kong?
China, at 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Hong Kong as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between China and Hong Kong?
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Hong Kong?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do China and Hong Kong rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
China ranks 27th and Hong Kong ranks 28th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Hong Kong: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/china/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/china/hong-kong-sar-china/">China vs Hong Kong: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.