Colombia vs Palestine: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Colombia
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Palestine
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
97th
Palestine rank
95th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Colombia
  • Palestine
0000199020062023

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Colombia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Palestine's figure about 1.1 times Colombia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Colombia ahead.

Colombia ranks 97th and Palestine ranks 95th of 202 countries.

Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Palestine Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Colombia
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Colombia
2020s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Colombia or Palestine?
Palestine, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Colombia as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Colombia and Palestine?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Palestine?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Palestine rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Colombia ranks 97th and Palestine ranks 95th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Palestine: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/colombia/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/colombia/west-bank-and-gaza/">Colombia vs Palestine: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.