Costa Rica vs Finland: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Costa Rica
0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
37th
Finland rank
35th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Finland
0000199020062023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Finland ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 37th and Finland ranks 35th of 202 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Finland Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Finland?
Finland, at 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Finland?
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Finland?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Finland rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 37th and Finland ranks 35th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Finland: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/finland/">Costa Rica vs Finland: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.