Costa Rica vs Lebanon: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Costa Rica
0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Lebanon
0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
37th
Lebanon rank
40th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Lebanon
000000200020112023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Lebanon, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Lebanon's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 37th and Lebanon ranks 40th of 202 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Lebanon Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Lebanon?
Costa Rica, at 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Lebanon as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Lebanon?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Lebanon?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Lebanon rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 37th and Lebanon ranks 40th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Lebanon: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/lebanon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/lebanon/">Costa Rica vs Lebanon: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.