Ecuador vs Malaysia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Ecuador
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
72nd
Malaysia rank
69th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Malaysia
00000197119972023

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 72nd and Malaysia ranks 69th of 202 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Malaysia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Malaysia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Ecuador or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Ecuador and Malaysia?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malaysia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Malaysia rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 72nd and Malaysia ranks 69th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Malaysia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/malaysia/">Ecuador vs Malaysia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.