Equatorial Guinea vs Kiribati: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
136th
Kiribati rank
138th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Kiribati
0000200020112023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 136th and Kiribati ranks 138th of 202 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Kiribati Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Kiribati?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Kiribati?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Kiribati?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Kiribati rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 136th and Kiribati ranks 138th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Kiribati: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/kiribati/">Equatorial Guinea vs Kiribati: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.