Eritrea vs Solomon Islands: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Eritrea
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Eritrea rank
178th
Solomon Islands rank
180th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Eritrea
  • Solomon Islands
00000200020112023

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.2 times Solomon Islands's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Eritrea ranks 178th and Solomon Islands ranks 180th of 202 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre —
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Eritrea
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Eritrea or Solomon Islands?
Eritrea, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Eritrea and Solomon Islands?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Solomon Islands?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Eritrea and Solomon Islands rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Eritrea ranks 178th and Solomon Islands ranks 180th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Solomon Islands: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/solomon-islands/">Eritrea vs Solomon Islands: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.