Faroe Islands vs Romania: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Faroe Islands
0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Faroe Islands rank
54th
Romania rank
53rd

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Romania
0000197119972023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Faroe Islands, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Romania ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 54th and Romania ranks 53rd of 202 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Romania Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Romania
2010s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Romania
2020s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Faroe Islands or Romania?
Romania, at 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Faroe Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Faroe Islands and Romania?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Romania?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Faroe Islands and Romania rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Faroe Islands ranks 54th and Romania ranks 53rd of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Romania: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/romania/">Faroe Islands vs Romania: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.