Faroe Islands vs Serbia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Faroe Islands
0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia
0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Faroe Islands rank
54th
Serbia rank
55th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Serbia
000000200020112023

How they compare

Faroe Islands currently reports 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 54th and Serbia ranks 55th of 202 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Faroe Islands averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Serbia
2010s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Serbia
2020s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Faroe Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Faroe Islands or Serbia?
Faroe Islands, at 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Faroe Islands and Serbia?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Faroe Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Faroe Islands and Serbia rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Faroe Islands ranks 54th and Serbia ranks 55th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Serbia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/serbia/">Faroe Islands vs Serbia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.