Guam vs Hungary: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Guam
0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary
0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Guam rank
33rd
Hungary rank
32nd

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Guam
  • Hungary
0000199020062023

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Guam, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Guam's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Hungary ahead.

Guam ranks 33rd and Hungary ranks 32nd of 202 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guam Hungary Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Hungary
2020s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Guam or Hungary?
Hungary, at 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Guam as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Guam and Hungary?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Hungary?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Guam and Hungary rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Guam ranks 33rd and Hungary ranks 32nd of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guam vs Hungary: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/guam/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/guam/hungary/">Guam vs Hungary: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.