Guatemala vs Panama: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Guatemala
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
74th
Panama rank
71st

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Panama
00000200020112023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 74th and Panama ranks 71st of 202 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Panama Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Panama
2010s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Panama
2020s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Guatemala or Panama?
Panama, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Guatemala and Panama?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Panama?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Panama rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 74th and Panama ranks 71st of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Panama: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/panama/">Guatemala vs Panama: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.