Indonesia vs South Africa: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Indonesia
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia rank
107th
South Africa rank
109th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Indonesia
  • South Africa
0000197119972023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Indonesia ahead.

Indonesia ranks 107th and South Africa ranks 109th of 202 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 3 and South Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia South Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Indonesia
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Indonesia
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Indonesia or South Africa?
Indonesia, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Indonesia and South Africa?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and South Africa?
53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and South Africa rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Indonesia ranks 107th and South Africa ranks 109th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs South Africa: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/south-africa/">Indonesia vs South Africa: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.