Italy vs Portugal: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Italy
0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Italy rank
24th
Portugal rank
26th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Italy
  • Portugal
00000196519942023

How they compare

Italy currently reports 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Portugal, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Italy's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Italy ahead.

Italy ranks 24th and Portugal ranks 26th of 202 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Italy
1970s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Italy
1980s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Italy
1990s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Italy
2000s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Italy
2010s 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Italy
2020s 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Italy or Portugal?
Italy, at 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Portugal as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Italy and Portugal?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Portugal?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Italy and Portugal rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Italy ranks 24th and Portugal ranks 26th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Italy vs Portugal: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/italy/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/italy/portugal/">Italy vs Portugal: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.