Kiribati vs Sao Tome and Principe: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Kiribati
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati rank
138th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
141st

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Kiribati
  • Sao Tome and Principe
000000200020112023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.2 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Kiribati ranks 138th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 141st of 202 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Kiribati or Sao Tome and Principe?
Kiribati, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Kiribati and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Sao Tome and Principe?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Kiribati ranks 138th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 141st of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Sao Tome and Principe: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/sao-tome-and-principe/">Kiribati vs Sao Tome and Principe: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.