Lithuania vs Nepal: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Lithuania
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Lithuania rank
84th
Nepal rank
82nd

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Lithuania
  • Nepal
000000199220072023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Lithuania, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 84th and Nepal ranks 82nd of 202 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Nepal Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Lithuania
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Nepal
2020s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Lithuania or Nepal?
Nepal, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Lithuania and Nepal?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Nepal?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Nepal rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Lithuania ranks 84th and Nepal ranks 82nd of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Nepal: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/nepal/">Lithuania vs Nepal: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.