Lithuania vs Uruguay: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Lithuania
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Lithuania rank
84th
Uruguay rank
86th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Lithuania
  • Uruguay
000000199220072023

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 84th and Uruguay ranks 86th of 202 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Lithuania
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Lithuania or Uruguay?
Lithuania, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Lithuania and Uruguay?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Uruguay?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Uruguay rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Lithuania ranks 84th and Uruguay ranks 86th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Uruguay: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/uruguay/">Lithuania vs Uruguay: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.