Macao vs Singapore: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Macao
0.0067 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
0.0036 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Macao rank
1st
Singapore rank
2nd

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Macao
  • Singapore
00.0020.0040.0060.008197119972023

How they compare

Macao currently reports 0.0067 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0036 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 0.0031 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Macao's figure about 1.8 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Singapore ahead.

Macao ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 2nd of 202 countries.

Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macao Singapore Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0046 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0033 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Macao
2010s 0.007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Macao
2020s 0.0062 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0028 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0034 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Macao or Singapore?
Macao, at 0.0067 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0036 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Macao and Singapore?
0.0031 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Singapore?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Macao and Singapore rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Macao ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 2nd of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macao vs Singapore: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/singapore/">Macao vs Singapore: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.