Mexico vs New Caledonia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Mexico
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
101st
New Caledonia rank
100th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Mexico
  • New Caledonia
00000197119972023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Mexico ranks 101st and New Caledonia ranks 100th of 202 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico New Caledonia Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Mexico or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Mexico and New Caledonia?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and New Caledonia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Mexico and New Caledonia rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Mexico ranks 101st and New Caledonia ranks 100th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs New Caledonia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/mexico/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/mexico/new-caledonia/">Mexico vs New Caledonia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.