Mexico vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Mexico
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
101st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
104th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Mexico
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
000000197119972023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 101st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 104th of 202 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Mexico or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Mexico, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Mexico and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Mexico ranks 101st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 104th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/mexico/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/mexico/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Mexico vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.