Myanmar vs Zimbabwe: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Myanmar
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Myanmar rank
131st
Zimbabwe rank
133rd

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Myanmar
  • Zimbabwe
0000200020112023

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Myanmar ranks 131st and Zimbabwe ranks 133rd of 202 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Myanmar
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Myanmar or Zimbabwe?
Myanmar, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Myanmar and Zimbabwe?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Zimbabwe?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Myanmar and Zimbabwe rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Myanmar ranks 131st and Zimbabwe ranks 133rd of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs Zimbabwe: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/myanmar/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/myanmar/zimbabwe/">Myanmar vs Zimbabwe: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.