Netherlands vs Singapore: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Netherlands
0.0018 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
0.0036 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Netherlands rank
5th
Singapore rank
2nd

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Netherlands
  • Singapore
00.0010.0020.0030.004196519942023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0.0036 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0018 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Netherlands, a difference of 0.0018 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 2.0 times Netherlands's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Netherlands ahead.

Netherlands ranks 5th and Singapore ranks 2nd of 202 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Netherlands averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands Singapore Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Netherlands
1980s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Netherlands
1990s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0028 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Netherlands or Singapore?
Singapore, at 0.0036 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0018 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Netherlands as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Netherlands and Singapore?
0.0018 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Singapore?
53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Netherlands and Singapore rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Netherlands ranks 5th and Singapore ranks 2nd of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Netherlands vs Singapore: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/netherlands/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/netherlands/singapore/">Netherlands vs Singapore: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.