New Zealand vs Poland: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

New Zealand
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
58th
Poland rank
57th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • New Zealand
  • Poland
0000196519942023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 50 shared years of data; in 1974 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 58th and Poland ranks 57th of 202 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Poland Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, New Zealand or Poland?
Poland, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between New Zealand and Poland?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Poland?
50 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Poland rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
New Zealand ranks 58th and Poland ranks 57th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Poland: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/poland/">New Zealand vs Poland: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.