Norway vs Spain: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Norway
0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Spain
0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
21st
Spain rank
23rd

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Norway
  • Spain
00000196519942023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Spain, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Norway ranks 21st and Spain ranks 23rd of 202 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Spain Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Norway
1970s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Norway
1980s 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Norway
1990s 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Norway
2000s 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Norway
2010s 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Norway
2020s 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Norway or Spain?
Norway, at 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Spain as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Norway and Spain?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Spain?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Norway and Spain rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Norway ranks 21st and Spain ranks 23rd of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Spain: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/norway/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/norway/spain/">Norway vs Spain: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.