Papua New Guinea vs Saudi Arabia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Papua New Guinea
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea rank
164th
Saudi Arabia rank
166th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Saudi Arabia
0000197119972023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Papua New Guinea ranks 164th and Saudi Arabia ranks 166th of 202 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Papua New Guinea or Saudi Arabia?
Papua New Guinea, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Papua New Guinea and Saudi Arabia?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Saudi Arabia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Papua New Guinea and Saudi Arabia rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Papua New Guinea ranks 164th and Saudi Arabia ranks 166th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Saudi Arabia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/saudi-arabia/">Papua New Guinea vs Saudi Arabia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.