Portugal vs Spain: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Portugal
0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Spain
0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal rank
26th
Spain rank
23rd

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Portugal
  • Spain
00000196519942023

How they compare

Spain currently reports 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Portugal, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Spain's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Portugal ahead.

Portugal ranks 26th and Spain ranks 23rd of 202 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Portugal averaged higher in 2 and Spain in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Portugal Spain Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Portugal
1970s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Spain
1990s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Spain
2000s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Spain
2010s 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Spain
2020s 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Portugal or Spain?
Spain, at 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Portugal as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Portugal and Spain?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Spain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Spain?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Portugal and Spain rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Portugal ranks 26th and Spain ranks 23rd of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Portugal vs Spain: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/portugal/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/portugal/spain/">Portugal vs Spain: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.