South Africa vs Uganda: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

South Africa
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa rank
109th
Uganda rank
110th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • South Africa
  • Uganda
0000197119972023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 109th and Uganda ranks 110th of 202 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, South Africa or Uganda?
South Africa, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between South Africa and Uganda?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Uganda?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Uganda rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
South Africa ranks 109th and Uganda ranks 110th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Uganda: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/uganda/">South Africa vs Uganda: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.