Sudan vs Suriname: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Sudan
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Sudan rank
150th
Suriname rank
151st

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Sudan
  • Suriname
00000200020112023

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Suriname ahead.

Sudan ranks 150th and Suriname ranks 151st of 202 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sudan Suriname Difference Ahead
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Sudan or Suriname?
Sudan, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Sudan and Suriname?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Suriname?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Sudan and Suriname rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Sudan ranks 150th and Suriname ranks 151st of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sudan vs Suriname: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/sudan/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/sudan/suriname/">Sudan vs Suriname: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.