Tonga vs Zimbabwe: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Tonga
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Tonga rank
134th
Zimbabwe rank
133rd

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Tonga
  • Zimbabwe
0000200020112023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Tonga, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Tonga ranks 134th and Zimbabwe ranks 133rd of 202 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tonga Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Tonga or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Tonga as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Tonga and Zimbabwe?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tonga and Zimbabwe?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Tonga and Zimbabwe rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Tonga ranks 134th and Zimbabwe ranks 133rd of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tonga vs Zimbabwe: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/tonga/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/tonga/zimbabwe/">Tonga vs Zimbabwe: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.