El Salvador vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Energy — Emissions (CO2), per square kilometre

El Salvador
0.375 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.3895 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
67th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
64th

Energy — Emissions (CO2), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.3895 kt per square kilometre against 0.375 kt per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0145 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 67th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 64th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 5 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0483 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0483 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 0.0884 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0884 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 0.0881 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0881 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 0.1931 kt per square kilometre 0.0776 kt per square kilometre 0.1155 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.279 kt per square kilometre 0.1992 kt per square kilometre 0.0798 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.2907 kt per square kilometre 0.3326 kt per square kilometre 0.0419 kt per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 0.3393 kt per square kilometre 0.3839 kt per square kilometre 0.0447 kt per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy — emissions (co2), per square kilometre, El Salvador or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.3895 kt per square kilometre against 0.375 kt per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in energy — emissions (co2), per square kilometre between El Salvador and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0145 kt per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for energy — emissions (co2), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 67th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 64th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Energy — Emissions (CO2), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Energy — Emissions (CO2), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/turks-and-caicos-islands/">El Salvador vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Energy — Emissions (CO2), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy — Emissions (CO2), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 10,734 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Energy — Emissions (CO2) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.