Belgium vs Libya: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Belgium
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 92,456 kt against 88,994 kt in Belgium, a difference of 3,462 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 57th and Libya ranks 56th of 231 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 108,067 kt | 83,290 kt | 24,777 kt | Belgium |
| 2010s | 98,856 kt | 71,409 kt | 27,447 kt | Belgium |
| 2020s | 92,520 kt | 79,322 kt | 13,198 kt | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher energy — emissions (co2eq), Belgium or Libya?
- Libya, at 92,456 kt against 88,994 kt in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in energy — emissions (co2eq) between Belgium and Libya?
- 3,462 kt, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Libya?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Libya rank globally for energy — emissions (co2eq)?
- Belgium ranks 57th and Libya ranks 56th of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf