Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United Republic of Tanzania: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq)

Democratic Republic of the Congo
25,585 kt
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
25,642 kt
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
100th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
99th

Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • United Republic of Tanzania
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 25,642 kt against 25,585 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 57 kt.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 100th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 99th of 231 countries.

Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 4,384 kt 2,881 kt 1,503 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
1970s 6,948 kt 4,405 kt 2,543 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
1980s 11,164 kt 5,013 kt 6,151 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
1990s 11,672 kt 6,606 kt 5,066 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2000s 12,165 kt 11,773 kt 392.68 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2010s 20,976 kt 18,554 kt 2,422 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 25,248 kt 24,371 kt 877.6 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy — emissions (co2eq), Democratic Republic of the Congo or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 25,642 kt against 25,585 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in energy — emissions (co2eq) between Democratic Republic of the Congo and United Republic of Tanzania?
57 kt, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for energy — emissions (co2eq)?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 100th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 99th of 231 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United Republic of Tanzania: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United Republic of Tanzania: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
264 places, 15,205 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf