Ecuador vs Serbia: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 54,647 kt against 53,973 kt in Ecuador, a difference of 674 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 72nd and Serbia ranks 71st of 231 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38,710 kt | 59,951 kt | 21,240 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 47,403 kt | 54,267 kt | 6,864 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 48,380 kt | 55,142 kt | 6,762 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher energy — emissions (co2eq), Ecuador or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 54,647 kt against 53,973 kt in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in energy — emissions (co2eq) between Ecuador and Serbia?
- 674 kt, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia rank globally for energy — emissions (co2eq)?
- Ecuador ranks 72nd and Serbia ranks 71st of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf