How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sri Lanka?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Sri Lanka: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Belarus

0.2765 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Sri Lanka

0.2972 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Belarus rank

80th

Sri Lanka rank

77th

Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

Belarus
Sri Lanka

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0.2972 kt per square kilometre against 0.2765 kt per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.0207 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 80th and Sri Lanka ranks 77th of 186 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Sri Lanka	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.3396 kt per square kilometre	0.1235 kt per square kilometre	0.2161 kt per square kilometre	Belarus
2000s	0.2982 kt per square kilometre	0.2028 kt per square kilometre	0.0954 kt per square kilometre	Belarus
2010s	0.3078 kt per square kilometre	0.302 kt per square kilometre	0.0057 kt per square kilometre	Belarus
2020s	0.2892 kt per square kilometre	0.3105 kt per square kilometre	0.0214 kt per square kilometre	Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Belarus or Sri Lanka?: Sri Lanka, at 0.2972 kt per square kilometre against 0.2765 kt per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in energy — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Belarus and Sri Lanka?: 0.0207 kt per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sri Lanka?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Sri Lanka rank globally for energy — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?: Belarus ranks 80th and Sri Lanka ranks 77th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Sri Lanka: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/sri-lanka/">Belarus vs Sri Lanka: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 187 places, 10,734 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.