Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Nauru: Energy — Emissions

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
0.0006 kt
in 2023
Nauru
0.0007 kt
in 2023
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha rank
227th
Nauru rank
225th

Energy — Emissions over time

  • Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
  • Nauru
0000.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 0.0007 kt against 0.0006 kt in Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, a difference of 0.0001 kt.

That makes Nauru's figure about 1.2 times Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nauru ahead.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 227th and Nauru ranks 225th of 229 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha averaged higher in 2 and Nauru in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha Nauru Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt 0.0001 kt 0.0001 kt Nauru
1970s 0 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0002 kt Nauru
1980s 0.0001 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0001 kt Nauru
1990s 0.0001 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0001 kt Nauru
2000s 0.0003 kt 0.0002 kt 0 kt Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2010s 0.0005 kt 0.0004 kt 0 kt Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2020s 0.0005 kt 0.0007 kt 0.0001 kt Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy — emissions, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or Nauru?
Nauru, at 0.0007 kt against 0.0006 kt in Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha as of 2023.
What is the difference in energy — emissions between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Nauru?
0.0001 kt, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Nauru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Nauru rank globally for energy — emissions?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 227th and Nauru ranks 225th of 229 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Energy — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Nauru: Energy — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/nauru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/nauru/">Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Nauru: Energy — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy — Emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
262 places, 15,109 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf