Belarus vs Uzbekistan: Energy — Emissions
Energy — Emissions over time
- Belarus
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 1.87 kt against 1.79 kt in Belarus, a difference of 0.08 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 62nd and Uzbekistan ranks 59th of 199 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.9 kt | 0.9407 kt | 0.963 kt | Belarus |
| 2000s | 1.79 kt | 0.9859 kt | 0.8011 kt | Belarus |
| 2010s | 1.86 kt | 0.9716 kt | 0.8924 kt | Belarus |
| 2020s | 1.81 kt | 1.79 kt | 0.0125 kt | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher energy — emissions, Belarus or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 1.87 kt against 1.79 kt in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in energy — emissions between Belarus and Uzbekistan?
- 0.08 kt, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Uzbekistan rank globally for energy — emissions?
- Belarus ranks 62nd and Uzbekistan ranks 59th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Energy — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf