Cuba vs Turkmenistan: Energy — Emissions
Energy — Emissions over time
- Cuba
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.511 kt against 0.511 kt in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 115th and Turkmenistan ranks 115th of 199 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.3 kt | 0.2161 kt | 1.08 kt | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0.8336 kt | 0.4293 kt | 0.4043 kt | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0.6386 kt | 0.5331 kt | 0.1055 kt | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0.521 kt | 0.5088 kt | 0.0122 kt | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher energy — emissions, Cuba or Turkmenistan?
- Cuba, at 0.511 kt against 0.511 kt in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in energy — emissions between Cuba and Turkmenistan?
- 0 kt, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Turkmenistan rank globally for energy — emissions?
- Cuba ranks 115th and Turkmenistan ranks 115th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Energy — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf