China, Hong Kong SAR vs Malawi: Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions

China, Hong Kong SAR
0.1682 kt
in 2023
Malawi
0.1841 kt
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
104th
Malawi rank
102nd

Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Malawi
00.050.10.150.2199020062023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.1841 kt against 0.1682 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.0159 kt.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 104th and Malawi ranks 102nd of 222 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 3 and Malawi in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1343 kt 0.0112 kt 0.1231 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 0.1618 kt 0.0286 kt 0.1333 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 0.1886 kt 0.1209 kt 0.0677 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 0.1826 kt 0.1828 kt 0.0002 kt Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy use (pre- and post-production) — emissions, China, Hong Kong SAR or Malawi?
Malawi, at 0.1841 kt against 0.1682 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in energy use (pre- and post-production) — emissions between China, Hong Kong SAR and Malawi?
0.0159 kt, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Malawi?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Malawi rank globally for energy use (pre- and post-production) — emissions?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 104th and Malawi ranks 102nd of 222 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Malawi: Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-use-pre-and-post-production-emissions-ch4/china-hong-kong-sar/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-use-pre-and-post-production-emissions-ch4/china-hong-kong-sar/malawi/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Malawi: Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions (CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
276 places, 8,972 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.