Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions

Ecuador
4,843 kt
in 2023
Zimbabwe
3,801 kt
in 2023
Ecuador rank
63rd
Zimbabwe rank
66th

Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions over time

  • Ecuador
  • Zimbabwe
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k199020062023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 4,843 kt against 3,801 kt in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1,042 kt.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 63rd and Zimbabwe ranks 66th of 216 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 1,955 kt 652.37 kt 1,303 kt Ecuador
2000s 3,143 kt 741.82 kt 2,401 kt Ecuador
2010s 4,410 kt 1,189 kt 3,222 kt Ecuador
2020s 4,531 kt 2,536 kt 1,995 kt Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy use (pre- and post-production) — emissions, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
Ecuador, at 4,843 kt against 3,801 kt in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in energy use (pre- and post-production) — emissions between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
1,042 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for energy use (pre- and post-production) — emissions?
Ecuador ranks 63rd and Zimbabwe ranks 66th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-use-pre-and-post-production-emissions-co2/ecuador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-use-pre-and-post-production-emissions-co2/ecuador/zimbabwe/">Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions (CO2)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
276 places, 8,972 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.