Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Norfolk Island: Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions (CO2eq)
Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
- Norfolk Island
How they compare
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha currently reports 0.5948 kt against 0.0208 kt in Norfolk Island, a difference of 0.574 kt.
That makes Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha's figure about 28.6 times Norfolk Island's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha has been ahead every year.
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 221st and Norfolk Island ranks 224th of 226 countries.
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha | Norfolk Island | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.5077 kt | 0.0308 kt | 0.4769 kt | Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha |
| 2000s | 0.4825 kt | 0.0316 kt | 0.4509 kt | Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha |
| 2010s | 0.7252 kt | 0.0125 kt | 0.7127 kt | Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha |
| 2020s | 0.6267 kt | 0.0208 kt | 0.6059 kt | Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher energy use (pre- and post-production) — emissions (co2eq), Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or Norfolk Island?
- Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, at 0.5948 kt against 0.0208 kt in Norfolk Island as of 2023.
- What is the difference in energy use (pre- and post-production) — emissions (co2eq) between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Norfolk Island?
- 0.574 kt, with Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Norfolk Island?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Norfolk Island rank globally for energy use (pre- and post-production) — emissions (co2eq)?
- Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 221st and Norfolk Island ranks 224th of 226 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.