Aruba vs China, Macao SAR: Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions

Aruba
0.0035 kt
in 2023
China, Macao SAR
0.0036 kt
in 2023
Aruba rank
168th
China, Macao SAR rank
167th

Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions over time

  • Aruba
  • China, Macao SAR
0.0010.0020.0030.004199020062023

How they compare

China, Macao SAR currently reports 0.0036 kt against 0.0035 kt in Aruba, a difference of 0.0001 kt.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 168th and China, Macao SAR ranks 167th of 222 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 3 and China, Macao SAR in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba China, Macao SAR Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0021 kt 0.0013 kt 0.0007 kt Aruba
2000s 0.0032 kt 0.002 kt 0.0012 kt Aruba
2010s 0.0036 kt 0.0037 kt 0.0001 kt China, Macao SAR
2020s 0.0035 kt 0.0035 kt 0 kt Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy use (pre- and post-production) — emissions, Aruba or China, Macao SAR?
China, Macao SAR, at 0.0036 kt against 0.0035 kt in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in energy use (pre- and post-production) — emissions between Aruba and China, Macao SAR?
0.0001 kt, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and China, Macao SAR?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Aruba and China, Macao SAR rank globally for energy use (pre- and post-production) — emissions?
Aruba ranks 168th and China, Macao SAR ranks 167th of 222 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs China, Macao SAR: Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-use-pre-and-post-production-emissions-n2o/aruba/china-macao-sar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-use-pre-and-post-production-emissions-n2o/aruba/china-macao-sar/">Aruba vs China, Macao SAR: Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
276 places, 8,972 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.