China, Hong Kong SAR vs Sao Tome and Principe: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CH4)

China, Hong Kong SAR
0.2429 kt
in 2050
Sao Tome and Principe
0.2125 kt
in 2050
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
216th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
217th

Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CH4) over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.250.50.7511.2196120052050

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0.2429 kt against 0.2125 kt in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.0304 kt.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, China, Hong Kong SAR has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 216th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 217th of 227 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 1.1 kt 0.15 kt 0.9468 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 1.07 kt 0.1136 kt 0.9531 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 0.6371 kt 0.1441 kt 0.493 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 0.2877 kt 0.1689 kt 0.1187 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 0.3054 kt 0.1661 kt 0.1393 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 0.2607 kt 0.1286 kt 0.1321 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 0.2405 kt 0.146 kt 0.0945 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2030s 0.2036 kt 0.1787 kt 0.0249 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2050s 0.2429 kt 0.2125 kt 0.0304 kt China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enteric fermentation — emissions, China, Hong Kong SAR or Sao Tome and Principe?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0.2429 kt against 0.2125 kt in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2050.
What is the difference in enteric fermentation — emissions between China, Hong Kong SAR and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0304 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Sao Tome and Principe?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for enteric fermentation — emissions?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 216th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 217th of 227 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Sao Tome and Principe: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/sao-tome-and-principe/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Sao Tome and Principe: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
260 places, 15,408 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf