Costa Rica vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) (CO2eq AR5)

Costa Rica
2,716 kt
in 2050
Democratic Republic of the Congo
3,057 kt
in 2050
Costa Rica rank
121st
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
119th

Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) (CO2eq AR5) over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196120052050

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 3,057 kt against 2,716 kt in Costa Rica, a difference of 341 kt.

That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 121st and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 119th of 227 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 8 and Democratic Republic of the Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 2,006 kt 1,103 kt 903 kt Costa Rica
1970s 2,981 kt 1,429 kt 1,551 kt Costa Rica
1980s 3,771 kt 1,670 kt 2,101 kt Costa Rica
1990s 3,118 kt 1,775 kt 1,343 kt Costa Rica
2000s 2,249 kt 1,388 kt 861.23 kt Costa Rica
2010s 2,624 kt 1,579 kt 1,045 kt Costa Rica
2020s 3,414 kt 2,110 kt 1,304 kt Costa Rica
2030s 2,552 kt 2,042 kt 509.64 kt Costa Rica
2050s 2,716 kt 3,057 kt 341.35 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq), Costa Rica or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 3,057 kt against 2,716 kt in Costa Rica as of 2050.
What is the difference in enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) between Costa Rica and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
341 kt, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Costa Rica and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq)?
Costa Rica ranks 121st and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 119th of 227 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/costa-rica/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/costa-rica/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Costa Rica vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
260 places, 15,408 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf