Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) (CO2eq AR5)

Middle Africa
64,622 kt
in 2050
United Republic of Tanzania
34,116 kt
in 2050
Middle Africa rank
26th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
27th

Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) (CO2eq AR5) over time

  • Middle Africa
  • United Republic of Tanzania
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196120052050

How they compare

Middle Africa currently reports 64,622 kt against 34,116 kt in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 30,506 kt.

That makes Middle Africa's figure about 1.9 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Middle Africa ahead.

Middle Africa ranks 26th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 27th of 33 groups.

Middle Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 10,699 kt 9,695 kt 1,004 kt Middle Africa
1970s 13,166 kt 11,790 kt 1,377 kt Middle Africa
1980s 18,440 kt 13,798 kt 4,642 kt Middle Africa
1990s 25,695 kt 15,498 kt 10,197 kt Middle Africa
2000s 37,443 kt 20,077 kt 17,366 kt Middle Africa
2010s 57,080 kt 28,964 kt 28,117 kt Middle Africa
2020s 77,558 kt 39,692 kt 37,866 kt Middle Africa
2030s 52,604 kt 27,389 kt 25,216 kt Middle Africa
2050s 64,622 kt 34,116 kt 30,506 kt Middle Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq), Middle Africa or United Republic of Tanzania?
Middle Africa, at 64,622 kt against 34,116 kt in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2050.
What is the difference in enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) between Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
30,506 kt, with Middle Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq)?
Middle Africa ranks 26th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 27th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
260 places, 15,408 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf